If you enjoy what you read here you will also enjoy my novel
21 days in May
Please be aware this blog may be considered Illegal almost anywhere!

Truth Fact Faith Belief

Dictionaries would not exist if they gave the definition of "cup" as "small rodent found in peru" - Y'know they actually have to be describing what the word actually means. Ok so far? Happy with that? Well I am, so we're moving on.
So with the comprehension that the dictionary's only purpose is to house the actual meanings of the words held within, let's examine some... Hmm... let me see four words at random... hmmm. I know I'll pick...
Okay, so, they're not chosen entirely at random but since so many people seem confused about the boundaries of the valuable concepts these hugely important words encapsulate, I thought they deserved the spotlight.
I've listed them in order of most importance to a human's comprehension of known reality. Hey I had to list 'em somehow! I just thought this would be the most rational. Anyway, here are the dictionary definitions...
(table of definition links below)

This means: A FACT that has been VERIFIED.

This means: A piece of information about circumstances that EXIST or events that HAVE occurred.

This means: A strong BELIEF in a supernatural power or powers that control human destiny.

This means: Any NOTION (cognitive content) HELD as true.
As I see it then...
FAITH must be considered the opposite of FACT
and BELIEF, the opposite of TRUTH

Which I think makes following statement exactly truthful
If you have the TRUTH about the FACTS,
FAITH in a BELIEF is not required

Well it's been a bit of a meander but that brings us to the point...

Perhaps the words TRUTH and FACT should be restricted use words, limited to being uttered only when the truth is an actual verified fact.

Use of the words Truth and Fact by religious groups and preachers should be prohibited, as potentially misleading. And further I feel that perhaps other phrases should be considered questionable. For example - "Aint it the truth!" should perhaps be a prohibited response in churches, as it provides a false impression of the meaning of the word truth for those in the congregation who may not know the difference. For those of you who are religious, don't panic.
"Ain't it the truth!"
could easily be substituted with the equally rousing
"Ain't it what we believe!"

As a final point, I feel that globally, all governments need, with the utmost urgency, to initiate a wide-ranging multi-generational education program to alert all the peoples of this great globe to the actual meanings of the these important words.

I don't know how we got to a stage where we can't tell the difference...
Oh, wait, yes I do! Powerful church organisations have been inflicting their own purpose on our language for centuries. Insipidly, "innocently", substituting reality with their own brand of pretend until the followers of these archaic multinationals can no longer tell the difference between Truth and Belief.

Am I cross about this? Let's just say sometimes, one can have a glimmer of understanding about the sense of relief the Romans must have felt when they finally nailed up that aging delinquent hippie.

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Back to the Core TMQ"

Definition Links
The nature of English means dictionary definitions are to some extent listed by coloquial comprehension.
With all dictionaries all definitions are listed but differ on the order of meaning.
Truth Fact Faith Belief
Truth Fact Faith Belief
Truth Fact Faith Belief
Truth Fact Faith Belief
Truth Fact Faith Belief
Enhanced by Zemanta

The Vatican Can

I reckon the current Vatican mafia have got a damn cheek complaining about that memo!
(Massive kudos to the author by the way)
Especially when ALL of the items in the memo are not just good ideas, they are
 Public Relations Gold.
You'd think, given the unHoly Roman Empires current embarrassment of anti-riches, they'd be snapping the hand of anything that looks like it might shed a good light on them for a change.
So to the point of this blog...
I was so incensed by the audacity of the unabashed and unashamed stance taken by these pompous protectors of the fuckers of children, I thought I let one rip.

I'd have sung it myself but nobody wants that, so if anyone could that would be great. Record a copy for Youtube and give us a lyric credit eh? Cheers.

Remember the 'Candyman can' from that movie 1970's about a chocolate factory?

hum the tune a moment...

The Vatican Can

Who can take a baby
terrorise it too
fuck it in the face
and add a punishment or two?

The Vatican
The Vatican can
The Vatican can cause they mix it up as love and make the world taste poo

Who can take a childhood
Wrap it in a sigh
Suck out all the fun
and make the little baby's cry?

The Vatican?

The Vatican
The Vatican can
The Vatican can cause they fuck up all the love that makes the world taste good

Priestly Paedos make
Every child they take
Satisfying and delicious
Strip out their childhood wishes
You know that really is quite viscious

Who can take tomorrow
Dip it in the sleaze
Integrate some sorrow
Until the kids are on their knees?

The Vatican

The Vatican can

The Vatican can cause they mash up all the love
And make the world taste Crud
And the world tastes crud cause the Vatican thinks it should

Dear papa joe,
Should you want to get me back by mocking me or the memo you are invited to also rearrange the lyrics of a song. You go right ahead, sauce for the goose is what the bishop eats whilst millions starve so to speak...

And then 6 years later this pops up!

Alternatively, have a hear of the genius Mr Tim Minchin...

And another by another..

Find Pope Benedict - http://youtu.be/yv65zA_12Jg

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Boobquake Monitor Ready For Action

Thousands of scientist sprung into action this week. Their collective high concept goal?
To develop a way to measure the effects of the boobquake, announced only 5 days ago and due on the 26th April, this Monday!
Late last night, Professor Benjamin Hill, chief in charge of the KnickersKnackersKnockers
research labs, a group of geological experts and a collaboration of top team of lingerie manufacturers held a press conference.
Professor Hill explained...
"I'd heard of the boobquake, of course, but had really dismissed the cleric's magic trick as a ridiculous joke as, I presumed, had everyone else. Then, a couple of days ago, I read Crispy Sea's amplog "Men also have an important role in Boobquake: without us it won't work" (http://bit.ly/tT1Z6n) and instantly realised that we needed to act quickly. (Y'hear that y'slimes? I'm famous!)
I am therefore extremely delighted to announce that after a furious 48 hours and a seriously migrainous late night thinking session we are very excited to reveal a brand new piece of tremor monitoring equipment has been developed. We have already, because of the uncommonly short lead up time, distributed the device to a selection of key locations around the globe."
Professor Hill went on to say...
"The highly sensitive equipment is designed to be worn inside the male test subjects trousers."
The aptly named the "Cupsizemograph" will measure the boobquake, displaying its results which are measured on the also newly developed "Erecter" scale.
Professor Hill added, "This machine is designed not to measure any actual earthquake that may occur as that job is ably taken care of by the normal seismograph. No, the cupsizemographs are designed to measure the level of global arousal. If the exposure of female flesh instigates a rise in the normal 'background' arousal level it will be detected. This way we will be able to state if the increased arousal level during Monday's experiment was enough to cause any detected earthquake. With a strong positive result, we hope to show that the exposure of human flesh has no effect on tectonic plates. And so, we hope, debunking once and for all the primitive superstitious nonsense linked to human arousal, maybe even sufficiently proven to fee millions of women from the imprisonment in hideous black tents."

We shall see, good luck all for Monday

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Is This The Educational EDGE We Need

Just voicing support for...
'Six Steps to Change'
A series of policy steps proposed by Independent education foundation Edge which, Edge believe,
'will significantly raise the stature of practical and vocational learning in the UK'

I completely agree with the concept. My own personal political opinion on education is that students vocational skills should be encouraged over 'academic' or 'for the good of the country' reasons. And, if we become a nation of poets and sculptors, so be it - At least we'd be happy in our work!It's a little idealistic I know but hey the words ‘I have a dream’ just recently came true so...

Anyway back to reality, if you think that ‘all young people should have the opportunity to achieve their potential, and the UK's future workforce should be equipped with the skills to be successful in the modern economy’, watch the video, it pretty much tells you all you need to know.
Then click the links below to follow them on twitter, promote them on twitter and go to their website to
have your say on practical and vocational learning and what you would like to see change in the education system.

Video - First ever election broadcast generated completely by the public - http://youtu.be/aIxe2nmHIqw

For more details of how you can have your say
Click here

You can follow UKedge on Twitter

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

A Letter To The Future

I don't even know if this is a good idea, there are arguments for and against but it IS an idea and I thought I shouldn't be the censor of it so, instead, I'm hanging it out for you guys to dry, so to speak.

Open letter to all followers of the catholic faith who have suffered abuse,

Firstly, my commiserations, as an atheist I cannot begin to understand what this does to your perception of faith and, as someone who has never suffered abuse, I cannot begin to understand the affect being abused by a respected proponent of that faith had on you but you have my thoughts and anger.

And so to my point,

Many Sufferers of abuse have already had the courage to come forward and relay the injustices of the abuses against them but I sense there's probably another group who, whilst they do have the courage to speak out, do not have the opportunity because of current life circumstances. It is totally understandable that a person would not want to disrupt the good life they have now.
So, I ask all who have ever suffered abuse but especially this group, if you feel you cannot reveal the offences against you, please try to write a letter to the future.
I've heard it is commonly considered good therapy to 'write-it-out', so it may be of personal benefit to do so. I'd like to suggest however that your letter carry a purpose beyond therapy. Provide as many facts as you can of names, locations and dates of offences, so telling as detailed an account as you can of the offences of abuse against you.
When you are done, post that letter to yourself. When it arrives, write on the back. Stipulate that it is not to be opened until after your death, or at some other date farther in the future. Then simply store it with your other private papers and forget about it.
The Roman Catholic church isn't going anywhere soon, they're going to be around for a good while yet and, as the church is worth billions and has already paid out billions in compensation, there are bound to be funds put aside for the future care of those who have suffered because of their wilful negligence.
Even if you cannot, understandably, for whatever reason face the inquiry into your abuse please leave a record. So that in time the church can attempt to make amends for its inaction, and contribute to the care of any psychological problems your family may have indirectly suffered because of the abuse you endured.
But further, as I suggested, this simple letter may help bring into the light of the public arena the full extent of the church's organized deception and concealment of the perpetrators. I feel humanity needs to be able to truly comprehend the scale of abuses which have been concealed by the Roman Catholic church.

If you know someone who was abused support and encourage them to, if not come forward, then to at least write a letter to the future.

Please, the world needs eventually to know!

This is one of the Too Many Questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Beastly Sins Of The Seven Fathers?

I've just read the article - Catholic Church 'knew' paedophiles were recidivist as far back as 1963 by Ruth Gledhill - Times Online - WBLG: Link. The article is no longer available but the letter is here, page 13.

...a letter sent to the Pope in 1963 from a leader in the field of treatment of paedophile priests, warning that they were incorrigibly recidivist...

...In the 1960s his Church opened a special centre in Gloucestershire treating priests involved in sexual abuse including child abuse. It was run by an order that had warned the then Pope in 1963 about this compulsion...
On detailed inspection, this letter alone reveals that from 1963 the popes were fully aware of the scale abuse and the complexity of the situation. It screams that the church knew almost everything. The language used is assumptive of the pope's comprehension, there’s a longevity in it's wording, a long knowing, there's shorthand and no explanations. There is nothing in this that suggests the pope would be shocked. This letter was, I suggest, addressing a person who had detailed prior knowledge of the entire disastrous situation.

Anyway here we go - enjoy(?)
The LetterAnalysis
August 27, 1963

Most Holy Father:

Let me begin by thanking Your Holiness from the bottom of my heart on behalf of myself, Father Edward Woeber our assistant general and the Servants of the Holy Paraclete for the gracious audience of August 26. In accordance with Your Holiness’ desire I am summarizing some convictions on the problem of the problem priest that our (1)forty years in the priesthood and some twenty years of working exclusively in the Paraclete apostolate to help priests have crystallized in our soul.
(1)Forty years!
The letter is dated 1963 so going back 40 years from that date we get...
So the church knew almost a century ago!
That spans the tenure of 7 popes!
1Benedict XVI2005 –        
2John Paul II1978 – 2005
3John Paul I1978 – 1978
4Paul VI1963 – 1978
5John XXIII1958 – 1963
6Pius XII1939 – 1958
7Pius XI1922 – 1939
1) I believe the natural qualities and virtues of aspirants to the priesthood should be (2)more carefully observed before they are segregated and channeled towards the priesthood. To be a good priest, and only the good priest is the successful priest, the aspirant must be naturally of a generous and cheerful character. I am speaking now of the priest whose vocation is the so-called active vocation. Too many even good men but self-centred reach the priesthood.(2)Infers that the church was previously applying inefficient, ineffectual or incompetent observation of aspiring priests.
2) On this natural, generous and cheerful temperament the years of formation should be built and develop, side by side, the head and the heart into a unique partnership for God and with God. The brilliant priest is a liability rather than an asset to the Church unless, as in the case of Augustine and Aquinas, there is the warmth of a personal love for God and a natural humility that recognizes that the most brilliant intellect is shining only with the light reflected from the infinity of Divine Truth. Unfortunately there is an understandable temptation to consider the (3)brilliant student as adequate for the priesthood without a deep scrutiny of his interior spirit.(3)Infers that the previous policy was...
If the aspiring priest has smarts, ask no questions. Evidence of the church's long term self-serving demeanour.
3) There has been an alarming increase in the present era of priestly casualties. A neo-paganism has arisen. Christian modesty is at a low ebb (note Our Lord’s comment to the children of F...) and the priest who is walking and working in the midst of neo-paganism cannot but be affected by his environment. A century ago a parish priest in his rectory and a religious in his monastery had comparatively much less exposure to the world, the flesh and the (4)devil. His only means of survival today is a very real and personal interior life which is equivalently and effectively the life of a constant union with Christ motivated by personal love and sustained by abiding prayer and mortification. When these elements fail to be present, or to be maintained, the (5)casualties are bound to be multiplied. The present conditions could have been easily (6)predicted and are not in themselves surprising.(4)It’s obviously the devil’s doing! Because he’s really real you know!

(5)Casualties! A delightfully tactful way to describe CHILD RAPES.

(6)Predicted! Hey top Vatican blokes, If you’d taken your heads out of your messiah's big fat arse thousands of CHILD RAPES could have been avoided.
4) Having analysed raison d’être for the increased casualties let us now consider how they should be treated. This calls classification and along two lines:
a) the (7)length of time the priest in trouble has been in trouble;
b) classification according to the character of his problem and his own individual character. This last element is the (8)most vital factor in the prediction of his recovery.
Under the first class, obviously the priest who comes on penitential retreat after (9)long years of habitual sin will need a different treatment, if only in duration, than the priest whose fall is a first fall and who has had the good fortune to be brought up swiftly with the seriousness of his situation. Here we recommend to the Hierarchy the value of an ordered retreat which may well serve a priest from becoming hopelessly enmeshed. We have had (10)priests say to us: “Father if I had only come here on retreat a year ago, or two years ago, I would not now be under the (11)grave censure of the Church.
(7)Longevity of knowledge.

(8)It takes many cases for someone to come to this knowledge.

(9)Speaks to the vatican's longevity of knowledge about what it takes to 'cure' the paedophile priests.

(10)Priests – plural again!

(11)The priests themselves displaying that the censure of the church was the most annoying consequence of there actions. This statement should have been "I wouldn’t have destroyed all those babies."
5) The corrective remedies to be applied and their effectiveness will obviously depend upon the good will and character of the individual. Problems that arise from abnormal, homosexual tendencies are going to call for, not only spiritual, but understanding (12)psychiatric counselling. Personally I am not sanguine of the return of priests to active duty who have been addicted to abnormal practices, especially sins with the young. However, the (13)needs of the Church must be taken into consideration and activation of priests who have (14)seemingly recovered in this field may be considered but is only recommended where careful guidance and supervision is possible. Where there is indication of incorrigibility, because of the tremendous scandal given, I would most earnestly recommend total laicization. I say “total” designedly because when these men are taken before civil authority the non-Catholic world definitely blames the discipline of celibacy for the perversion of these men. They argue – rightly or wrongly – that these men turn to boys because they are denied the right of marriage.(12)The catholic church has repeatedly stated that they did not understand the situation.

(13)More evidence of the church's self-serving demeanour.

(14)Seemingly! - "It's okay, we'll risk it! They're only children after all!"
6) As for the (15)priests who has entered civil marriage, or who has (16)for years lived in concubinage, for the lifting of scandal and the elimination of the sacrilege arising from living in habitual sin as, above all, for the salvation of souls which is the Church’s reason for being I believe where there is no other invalidating impediment these unions should be quietly validated with the final punitive sanction eliminating any hope of priestly rehabilitation.(15)Plural again.

(16)Speaks to Vatican knowledge of the longevity of wrong doing.
7) The fear that this would encourage others doubtlessly has some weight but is it not true that the Church for centuries has granted dispensation from the solemn vows of religion – both men and women – if they insist and yet this has not made a notable change in the determination of the vast majority of religious to live [and] die within the voluntary renunciation of their vows. Moreover, there must be a realistic recognition of the fact that the (17)average priest who sins with a woman has no intention of abandoning his priestly life on a permanent basis and hence is not seeking an out from the priesthood. Moreover, (18)the knowledge that priests were abiding in priestly self-discipline by an abiding personal choice rather than the onus of vindictive law would bring a deeper respect for the priesthood (19)in the long range esteem of the Roman Catholic priesthood before the world.(17)Other infractions of the vow of celibacy are long known.

(18)Oh really? Priests being what they say they are, and are expected to be, without being forced - That would be a good thing? WOW! Insightful. Well, it would be better than them being CHILD RAPISTS anyway!

(19)And, as commendable as it is for the heads up it gave, the last words in the letter once again point toward the churches reputation.
AUGUST 27, 1963
(Very Rev.) Gerald M. C. Fitzgerald, s.P.
Superior General
Servants of the Holy Paraclete

Given that this letter is dated long before the pope was granted immunity from prosecution by George W. Bush, one must assume that the immunity was requested because the vatican knew what was coming and rather than own up and take responsibility they chose to deflect, to blame others, deny awareness of the dire situation and PROTECT THE POPE AT ALL COSTS! Exactly the sort of devious behaviour that in recent weeks we have come to expect from this gang of pompous snivelling fuckwits.
And about that immunity from prosecution - Hmmm - forgive me if I am being stupid here but why would an infallible being need immunity from prosecution? Doesn't infallible mean that you are never going to need immunity because you never going to do anything to require immunity from! Way to prove your Fallibility!
So, I suppose the conclusion is... we should arrest the pope and put him on trial for overlooking and concealing multiple crimes of paedophilia. And, while we're at it, we might as well posthumously try the previous 6 popes also.
I know it's hard in the current sleaze but I wholeheartedly wish you all happy thoughts. Personally, I feel like I'm covered in catholic, I'm going for a shower!

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Please sign the uk.gov petition to get the Pope Banned from the UK.

Need another reason to ban the pope?

Read More Catholic Evilness see the Catholic Evilness tab

Holy Colander Batman

The Vatican today announced that in an effort to modernise and, I suspect, to offset the terrible publicity it has recently received, the currently popular figure of pillory, Papa Joe, has sanctioned a range of condoms.
The Vatican is marketing the condoms, as "Total protection from STDs" ( that is, according to them, 'Satanically Transmitted Diseases.') Promising to protect the wearer from infection, though this is a claim common for all condoms.

The vatican points out, however, that the major difference their condoms offer is the Holy See's "Serving the Will of God" guarantee of excellence. certifying the condoms fit for catholic purpose.
Photograph of unrolled Durex condomImage via Wikipedia

The apparently much heralded, though I hadn't heard of it,
"Holy Colander range" 
has a matrix of one-way nano-valves built into the tip.

Upon...ahh.. issue, god's little swimmers are allowed to sally forth, so to speak, wriggling happily through the valves and merrily on their mission.

Cardinal Ivan Abottom, head of Vatican sex lab's Research and development division commented...
"Down here in the bunny warren, as we like to call it, we have been researching this technology for decades and, after hundreds of man, and woman hours of rigorous testing, under Chief Ratz' strict supervision of course, we have developed the Holy Colander. And are now in a position to be able to guarantee that the entire Holy Colander range releases over 93% of sperm, which excludes only those with abnormally fat, extra long or slow swimmers.
The church is expecting the Holy Colander range to sell extremely well. Everyone thinks it's going to be a big earner, especially amongst the sexually active members of the faith. I think this is a dream come for everyday catholics. "
Pack shot unavailable - so here are some colanders

More details as I get 'em.

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Please sign the uk.gov

to get the Pope Banned from the UK.

Need another reason to ban the pope?

Read More Catholic Evilness see the Catholic Evilness Tab.

Male Brain Gives Up Secrets Shocker

Well here we are, in the 21st century and, whilst the female brain looks set to defy scanning technology for the foreseeable(lol), for the humble the male brain it's finally happened. Its secrets, truths and indelicate intricacies uncovered, laid bare for clinical scrutiny. (Awww!) For the chauvinists amongst us, you've hopefully guessed that doesn't include me, the disaster comes in the knowledge that it's a woman who is telling its tale.
And we didn't even know it had any secrets! Did we lads? If we had, we'd have hidden 'em - right?
This is a quick clip from the fascinating article in which Louann Brizendine M.D. explains her book 'The Male Brain'. There's loads in it, the article I mean - not read the book but I just might after reading the article. Anyway I think this clip is the most illuminating fact I read...
Love, sex and the male brain
"If testosterone were beer, a 9-year-old boy would be getting the equivalent of a cup a day. But a 15-year-old would be getting the equivalent of nearly two gallons a day. This fuels their sexual engines and makes it impossible for them to stop thinking about female body parts and sex."
Reckon that explains everything?
give her article (http://edition.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/03/23/brizendine.male.brain/index.html) a read, I think she's right on the money with her description of the "Man Trance"

This is one of the Too many questions

Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

The Cost Of A Ticket To Heaven

The Faith, sculpted in stone from Badajoz in 1...Image via Wikipedia
 The current catholic paedophile scandal has rocked the world and it's likely to rumble on for a good while. And fair enough, if you've read my blogs you know, I stand somewhere in the region of - Nuke the Vatican, Let God sort it out - but for the average 'pretender in god' the phrase - "God will heal the paedophile of his perversion! We'll just put him in a room, so god can sort him out" - makes some sort of sense. The pretender in god actually believes, the 'god' is going to do something magical to that person in that room, so that when they come out they are all fixed better.
The problem is, of course, god has never existed, so locking a paedo in a room for a while so he can ask god for help and guidance, and think about what he's done, is exactly the same as doing nothing.
Make no mistake here, it is delusion which has enabled the children's suffering! The mad-as-a-loon, crazy-eyed belief in a god. The flat-stupid faith that the god will ultimately sort everything out for the best! (Panglossian almost)
From the common, everyday, head-in-the-sand parishioner to the topmost, holy suck-up, popiest pope, every last one of them felt safe - comforted by their imaginary grandad's cuddly blindfold.

  • The childrens' belief in god gave the priest more power over them.
The Children prayed for help - none came.
  • The paedo-priests' belief in god amplified the priests gratification - made the offence all the more filthy.
The paedo-priests prayed for help - none came.
  • The nuns' belief in god made them think they had no right to question the priests behaviour.
The nuns prayed for help - none came.
  • The faithful's belief in god made them disbelieve the victims.
The faithful prayed for help - none came.
  • The Bishops' belief in god made them believe the paedo when the paedo 'repented'.
The Bishops prayed for help - none came.
  • The Archbishops' belief in god organised some counseling when the paedo-priest re-offended.
The Archbishops prayed for help - none came.
  • The Cardinals' belief in god transferred the priest to some unsuspecting community and kept it out of the papers.

The Cardinals prayed for help - none came.
  • The Popes, god's representatives on earth, managed the whole nasty sticky mess so 'god' wouldn't be sullied!
The Popes prayed for help - none came.

And all the time, all of these people prayed god would, keep it out of the news, prayed god would, help the sinner, prayed god would, heal the victim. Of course nobody's prayer was answered because, as we all really know, there is nobody to answer them -


And all the time, that the faithful, the nuns, the good priests, the bishops, the archbishops, the cardinals and popes were busy praying hard, a child in the dark was also praying...

"Oh God, please, no more! Don't let it happen any mo-or-ore..."

For ALL of these people, more than a billion catholics worldwide, the cost of a ticket to heaven has recently gone up.
Alongside the normal prostrations a catholic must make, to show worthiness of entry to Pretendsville, each and every catholic must now consider the thousands and thousands, possibly millions, of childrens' innocence, trust, faith and futures that have been destroyed because of the flock's collective afterlife wishing.
I feel for the catholics who choose to continue pretending in god, for them the walls that line the stairway to the kingdom of their god now carry permanently looped video footage of every child that was ever abused by any priest.

If they all had not believed in a god so blindly,
 these monsters would not have been concealed.
If they all had not believed in a god at all,
 there would have been nothing to conceal them behind.

The human cost of a ticket to heaven is already shamefully high.
For the sake of humanity,
won't you just give up
 pretending in god?

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Unlock the Vatican Secret Archives

Coat of arms of the Vatican City {{mk|Грб на В...Image via Wikipedia
Dear Papa Joe,
In the spirit of honesty, morality, honour, justice and purity which is currently stalking the halls of the Vatican (I can dream!) we the free peoples of earth would all like it very much if you would allow full access to the Vatican archives - that's all of them mind you, even the super-duper secret ones, in the extra super special secret places.
Release the details of everything the roman catholic church has covered up, hidden, connived and contrived. All the secret meddling, bribery and corruption way back to when you were a minor cult in the Roman Empire.
You must be aware by our reaction to your organization's nasty ways that we're all grown up now. It's also now blatantly obvious that we are more moral than you.
Whatever is in there, we can handle! Thanks for your kind protection of these important relics but really, OPEN THE DOORS.
Come on, you know from recent experience that keeping secrets doesn't work, hand 'em over, we'll decide what's best to do.
Or have you something else to hide?
All the best, within reason,

Vatican Secret Archives

Vatican Secret Archives, which are as vast as they are old. Headed by a cardinal like the Vatican Library, another rumored storehouse of secrets, they partially open today to a few approved scholars who are let in only with specific purposes and with permission of the Pope.

It is the most mysterious institution in the papal city, for in its more than thirty miles of shelving are reputed to be the accumulated records of scandals, secrets, and revelations of the most shocking and explosive kind, blithely boxed and filed away with the insouciance born of centuries of silence and discretion.
Although scholars have had access to the secret archives since 1881, they remain closed to the general public.
DreyX: Top 10 Places YOU Can’t Go In The World

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Please sign the uk.gov

to get the Pope Banned from the UK.

Need another reason to ban the pope?

Read More Catholic Evilness on the Catholic Evilness Tab

It’s Happening Reg! It’s really happening!

Well It looks like it anyway...
Hopefully the German parishioners are the first flickering of the metaphorical torch that will set fire to the vatican's house of sin.
Good Friday rebellion across Germany as congregations vent anger at abusive priests
It may yet become known as the Good Friday Rebellion...
...Then the priest appealed: “Let us pray for the children who have been done great injustice within the Church community, who were abused.” The congregation made to bend their knees but the priest was not finished. “And for those who have sinned against children,” he added. Half of the congregation, perhaps 150 people, remained silently standing — a rare flash of defiance...
“We are learning daily about the methods of education in Catholic institutions in Austria in the 1960s and 1970s,” said Holger Eich, working a hotline for the Austrian group Platform for Victims of Violence by the Church. “Some 174 cases have come forward in the past fortnight. These methods can be summed up in one word — sadism.”

Times Online

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,

Please sign the uk.gov

to get the Pope Banned from the UK.

Need another reason to ban the pope?

Read More Catholic Evilness on the Catholic Evilness Tab

Are You a Doctrine Addict

There's a fire, you have only managed to quickly grab your baby and your Bible, you trip and fall, spilling both. As the fire flares and rages around you, you instinctively know you can only save one. There is no choice, you instantly perceive the true value of the two items and obviously, unless you are the most complete religious nutbag in evolutionary history, you chose to save your baby.

To take the paradigm a step further...
You are incapable of having further children, the baby you are carrying is the only remaining member of your family line and the Bible is the only remaining copy of the bible.
What's your answer now?

If it's still your baby then...
You have perceived the true value of your scripture - when compared to the continuation of your genetic lineage, the contents of a book are irrelevant.

If it was your Bible then...
Please seek psychiatric help immediately!
You are a Doctrine Addict. Do not pack a bag or tell anybody, just report with haste to your nearest mental hospital because you may be an immediate danger to yourself or others.

If you had to think about it then...
You need some help!
Fortunately we can start right now.
Your addiction to doctrine must be confronted directly. To successfully overcome your fixation with the physical aspect of the words you believe, you must destroy the container of your doctrine.
Your God will not mind, your God knows you are only destroying the container of the message to rid yourself of your potentially damaging addiction. Your God knows that your intention is not to destroy the meaning of the message, just free yourself from the monkey on your back.

Take your chosen sacred text and throw it into the paper recycling bin.
(We may as well be green in pursuit of psychological freedom!)
If your local authority does not have a paper recycling scheme (shame on them) there are other options...
A shredder and some flour & water paste could transform those mouldy old papers into a lovely new papier-mache ornament.
Or, if you get together with some friends from your church, you could make furniture - maybe even a pew!
Alternatively, to take inspiration and continue the example above, many sacred texts could be used as fuel to keep you warm, carefully though, do it safely, put it in you fireplace or take it outside, place it in a barbecue and, with health & safety uppermost in mind, set it alight.

Whichever method your choose, do it now, it's really important, maybe even essential for a speedy recovery from addiction to doctrine!

If you were offended by this bit of frivolity - please see instructions above for
You need some help!

This is one of the Too many questions


Please leave a comment - Anything will do
The best communications are often,


If you enjoy what you read here
you will also enjoy my novel
21 days in May

Please be aware this blog may be considered Illegal almost anywhere!

Too Many Questions - Headlines

Ratings and Recommendations by outbrain

My new blog:
Left of Sinister
It's kind of political.


Lijit Ad Wijit